+- Wings 3D Development Forum (https://www.wings3d.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Wings 3D (https://www.wings3d.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: ManifoldLab Plug-ins Collection (https://www.wings3d.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: fit big to smaller to ggaliens (/showthread.php?tid=521)
fit big to smaller to ggaliens - denisc - 12-19-2013
hi all
i try this fonction with dodec-fract.wings
i am reconstruct dodecahedron_l-system_II of jotero.
S.jpg
before that , i had try why my personnel model contruct with 3Dwing ,
but the
same fonction don't work????
ex1
a simple exemple
i create dodecaedron , i select 1face and inset to 0.
i select the opposite face inside and inset to 70 percent.
i select all and duplicate and move.
first model select a little face inside
second, a big face outside
fit big to smaller
and nothing for result
ex2
if i made the inset to 70 outside the first model ,that work!!
what is a special manip?
thanks in advance
thanks in advance ggaliens
RE: fit big to smaller to ggaliens - ggaliens - 12-20-2013
These attachments don't work so good for me.
Please post direct link and I can look at it.
RE: fit big to smaller to ggaliens - denisc - 12-21-2013
hello
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xao8v3wsqc1jsyd/Desktop.zip
i used Wings 3D 1.5.1 for that
RE: fit big to smaller to ggaliens - ggaliens - 12-31-2013
Sorry so darn slow. I think the answer to this one is easy ... "Fit Big to small" is very old. You must upgrade to get proper support.
RE: fit big to smaller to ggaliens - denisc - 01-06-2014
(12-31-2013, 02:28 PM)ggaliens Wrote: Sorry so darn slow. I think the answer to this one is easy ... "Fit Big to small" is very old. You must upgrade to get proper support.
hello ggaliens
i just read post for version 1.52
My version 1.51 was builted with un old experimental tar
i retry with the new version 1.52 now.
Fit Big to small is now fit on.
cheers
denisc
RE: fit big to smaller to ggaliens - ggaliens - 01-06-2014
I might need to re-build my .tar (beam files only ... plugins only) version.
It is probably fairly old. I thought it was from this fall ... but no date embedded in
filename. So that's an issue.
You could try the latest "all in one" versions if you were brave.