03-28-2013, 09:36 AM
Whatever the workflow ... whether it can be tidied up / made more consistent (or not) ... imo, user experence would be improved with better info line text - especially as there seems to be space for it.
Whilst I've not used it for many, many years, I recollect Rhino3D as having a very smooth workflow wrt boolean ops. Note I'm not talking about the actual (quality of) the geometry produced ... but the way user accesses the tools.
Unfortunately, I suspect such a workflow isn't readily compatible with wings', since user (iirc) could select the required boolean op ... without any object being selected.
As ever, my memory could be playing tricks, tho
pp
Whilst I've not used it for many, many years, I recollect Rhino3D as having a very smooth workflow wrt boolean ops. Note I'm not talking about the actual (quality of) the geometry produced ... but the way user accesses the tools.
Unfortunately, I suspect such a workflow isn't readily compatible with wings', since user (iirc) could select the required boolean op ... without any object being selected.
As ever, my memory could be playing tricks, tho
pp