Oort ... I'd prefer to wait until new idea RE BOOLEAN are reworked completely.
It takes more effort to make the ala-carte tarball for BOOLEAN and I might have a few more iterations to go.
I think of the rest of the plugins adjunct to BOOLEAN as a "LABORITORY" I can use in case something about BOOLEAN goes ODD-BALL. That's why it is manifoldLAB.
I will re TARBALL once I get to BOOLEAN 4.0 or something like that.
Why can't you test with the snapshot style ?
It feels substantially stronger than what I had a week ago. These the menu items of things to do with Booleans.
It takes more effort to make the ala-carte tarball for BOOLEAN and I might have a few more iterations to go.
I think of the rest of the plugins adjunct to BOOLEAN as a "LABORITORY" I can use in case something about BOOLEAN goes ODD-BALL. That's why it is manifoldLAB.
I will re TARBALL once I get to BOOLEAN 4.0 or something like that.
Why can't you test with the snapshot style ?
Code:
{ "Boolean Union (CSG)" , union, "Boolean Union" } ,
{ "Boolean Subtract (CSG)" , subtract, "Boolean Subtract" } ,
{ "Boolean Intersect (CSG)" , intersect, "Boolean Intersect" } ,
{ "Boolean Subtract++ (CSG)" , split, "Boolean Subtract++ : Subtract + Intersection == Impression " } ,
{ "Boolean Differences (CSG)" , differences, "Boolean Intersect Inverse (CSG)" } ,
{ "Volume Information", volume, "Volume info" }It feels substantially stronger than what I had a week ago. These the menu items of things to do with Booleans.