Micheus,
I think that "new" would be best.
I am thinking of a situation where I would have a large object centered on x,y,z. I merge in a file with one object that is also centered on x,y,z but smaller than the large object existing in the original file. The newly merged in object cannot be seen because it is hidden by the larger object in the scene.
With an added "new" selection, I can simply RMB > Move to move the object away from the larger object. Yes, I could select the newly merged in object in the Geometry Graph but having "new" would avoid that and if there are multiple objects in the merged in file, all the objects would already be selected.
Edit: Just noticed that the "e" is missing at the end of "Preserve" in the dialog box.
Thanks,
oort
I think that "new" would be best.
I am thinking of a situation where I would have a large object centered on x,y,z. I merge in a file with one object that is also centered on x,y,z but smaller than the large object existing in the original file. The newly merged in object cannot be seen because it is hidden by the larger object in the scene.
With an added "new" selection, I can simply RMB > Move to move the object away from the larger object. Yes, I could select the newly merged in object in the Geometry Graph but having "new" would avoid that and if there are multiple objects in the merged in file, all the objects would already be selected.
Edit: Just noticed that the "e" is missing at the end of "Preserve" in the dialog box.
Thanks,
oort