• Website
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Help
  • Old Forum
  • Social Media
    •   @Wings3dOfficial
    •   @Wings3dOfficial
    •   Wings3dOfficial
    •   Wings3dOfficial
  • Register
  • Login
  • Website
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Help
  • Old Forum
  • Register
  • Login
Wings 3D Development Forum Wings 3D Design & Development v
« Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 Next »
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ?

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ?

ggaliens
Offline

Erlang Hacker
Posts: 954
Threads: 143
Joined: Nov 2012
#1
12-13-2012, 06:00 PM
Any harm in increasing the number of IDs reported upper left ?

Like the list vertcies 1,4, 7, 9

to 1, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13


So that IDs of hexagon verts might also get included before threshhold is reached and its just says 7 vertices selected.

I would like to puch the limit up from < 5 to < 7


I'm suspicous that this was picked somewhat arbitrarily. If this would be annoying ... maybe I could make it a preference. I have bumped it up for myself and a fabricator who needs to interograte the model sometimes and uses this as a debugging tool.

I just wanted to ask first rather than just do a pull-request for change. I can always patch this later.

In real work apps ... Hexagons are common in nature and both hexagons and pentagons appear in any number of natural "FOAMS". I don't think the same is true for higher order polygons so much. I think the hexagon is at least arguabbly a good cut off. I personally think quads is not so great a cut-off.
optigon
Offline

Developer
Posts: 192
Threads: 26
Joined: Mar 2011
#2
12-15-2012, 03:39 AM
I don't think it's really that important to most users. Any cutoff is going to be arbitrary.

Maybe add an item to the Develop menu to create a window that shows a table of the currently selected elements.

Exposing Ids to users should remain limited. There is no need to clutter their work space.
dereksergio
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2013
#3
05-10-2013, 05:01 AM (This post was last modified: 05-10-2013, 05:02 AM by dereksergio.)
Please can you explain why cutoff is going to be arbitrary as i am not getting it please explain.
Try to explain at operating agreement for llc Florida.

ggaliens
Offline

Erlang Hacker
Posts: 954
Threads: 143
Joined: Nov 2012
#4
05-10-2013, 12:36 PM (This post was last modified: 05-10-2013, 12:36 PM by ggaliens.)
Actually ... the cut-off I was referring to was not arbitrary at all. It had to do with the properties of "FOAM" and triangles and other "natural" or easy to occur things.

I was not asking for 9, 10, 11. Just that hexagons be covererd and maybe one more. So my request was anything but arbitrary. I was asking on behalf of a 3D prototyper with worlds of experience in modelling for realization. It should be a preference.
Geta-Ve
Offline

Member

Posts: 152
Threads: 20
Joined: Nov 2012
#5
05-11-2013, 02:23 AM
While I myself have rarely needed more than the amount displayed currently, I can see it being useful in a small number of circumstances.

In which case, why not display it in the Console window? Or at least have some kind of command to show the vert/edge/face IDs of the currently select object.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode