05-30-2017, 12:45 AM
Thank you for your reply to my first question. It has opened my eyes. I had no idea that an absolute move could accept up to 3 selected parameters for reference, orientation, and intersection. I don't recall that in the manual, but I'll have to re-read again.
This does EXACTLY what I wanted:. Move a group along a constraint, snapping the reference vertex to a destination. Nothing I've found in the software or online materials showed this. Sweet!
I already know about LMB, MMB, and RMB choices. I knew before my first question. That there may be a rabbit hole of multiple parameters per choice is something new to me though. This actually answers some things about the program's behaviour that I've wondered about.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc0df/bc0df9b7eede4b1faf909de5790a041ea9e8a2bf" alt="Wink Wink"
This statement confuses me greatly. As I understand it, I agree that putting part 1 in the final location would have made this much easier. But then I wouldn't have needed to ask how to put it where I wanted? I'm still thinking about this, because I must be misunderstanding.
The shell extrude puzzles me. I know how to do it, but I would never have thought to. I didn't realize that the snap required a face for it's destination. That became a stumbling block for me.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a94ab/a94ab6f27558edd1f9d78197c27a3955e9675db8" alt="Cry Cry"
Also, I don't understand the difference between "extrude" and "shell extrude". I've read about both and tested them. What I've read only adds the words "as a unit" for shell extrude. I don't know why you chose "shell" to extrude a single face. The documentation should really say what the difference is by comparison. I see that there is a ghost line effect around the base of a shell extrusion, but I don't know what it signifies. I haven't used shell during a build yet, because it may be adding features I'm unaware of, and not taking proper advantage of.
I have tried many times to straighten a line between two vertices using each of the mouse buttons. I also found some buttons from an old calculator, glued them to my mouse, and tried pressing them too.
I have not figured this out yet, but I'll keep trying. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc0df/bc0df9b7eede4b1faf909de5790a041ea9e8a2bf" alt="Wink Wink"
Now that I know about multiple parameters per choice, I merely have to find out what they are, how to select them, and in what order they belong.
I can't watch videos. My only internet is a phone and I have limited data (yes, we exist). So I read. And test. And break stuff, and read some more.
*****
I have run into a repeatable TAB crash, even after the updates. I have the crash report, but started trying to figure out the cause first. I haven't submitted it as a bug yet, because it only occurs after merging in another model (which I'm using for scale reference). The only fix so far is a complete reboot. I'm going to have to fix the reference model-which may have some flipped normals. I mention it here because I'm not sure how robust the software is supposed to be, and if it's worth reporting yet.
This does EXACTLY what I wanted:. Move a group along a constraint, snapping the reference vertex to a destination. Nothing I've found in the software or online materials showed this. Sweet!
I already know about LMB, MMB, and RMB choices. I knew before my first question. That there may be a rabbit hole of multiple parameters per choice is something new to me though. This actually answers some things about the program's behaviour that I've wondered about.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc0df/bc0df9b7eede4b1faf909de5790a041ea9e8a2bf" alt="Wink Wink"
Quote:I believe you would have simplified your process if you (even moving as you did) have put the "part1" on its final location.
This statement confuses me greatly. As I understand it, I agree that putting part 1 in the final location would have made this much easier. But then I wouldn't have needed to ask how to put it where I wanted? I'm still thinking about this, because I must be misunderstanding.
The shell extrude puzzles me. I know how to do it, but I would never have thought to. I didn't realize that the snap required a face for it's destination. That became a stumbling block for me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a94ab/a94ab6f27558edd1f9d78197c27a3955e9675db8" alt="Cry Cry"
Also, I don't understand the difference between "extrude" and "shell extrude". I've read about both and tested them. What I've read only adds the words "as a unit" for shell extrude. I don't know why you chose "shell" to extrude a single face. The documentation should really say what the difference is by comparison. I see that there is a ghost line effect around the base of a shell extrusion, but I don't know what it signifies. I haven't used shell during a build yet, because it may be adding features I'm unaware of, and not taking proper advantage of.
I have tried many times to straighten a line between two vertices using each of the mouse buttons. I also found some buttons from an old calculator, glued them to my mouse, and tried pressing them too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb3ef/cb3efa014faf2ff37314ede442d3d9ec50c38553" alt="Biggrin Biggrin"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc0df/bc0df9b7eede4b1faf909de5790a041ea9e8a2bf" alt="Wink Wink"
Now that I know about multiple parameters per choice, I merely have to find out what they are, how to select them, and in what order they belong.
I can't watch videos. My only internet is a phone and I have limited data (yes, we exist). So I read. And test. And break stuff, and read some more.
*****
I have run into a repeatable TAB crash, even after the updates. I have the crash report, but started trying to figure out the cause first. I haven't submitted it as a bug yet, because it only occurs after merging in another model (which I'm using for scale reference). The only fix so far is a complete reboot. I'm going to have to fix the reference model-which may have some flipped normals. I mention it here because I'm not sure how robust the software is supposed to be, and if it's worth reporting yet.