12-08-2012, 11:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2012, 11:57 PM by puzzledpaul.)
Since we all have preferred ways of doing things, I'm unsure whether mine is 'smarter / shorter' would be correct ...
The bit I think could cause some problems is the duplicating / overlapping of geometry ... needing the use of cleanup.
Since the mesh looks ok - to the naked eye - it's not apparent whether it's been 'cleaned' or not.
In the noob world, this could cause problems.
I'd probably use a scale | rad >mmb > 0% op to re-locate the inner corner vert, after doing a couple of connect type sequences
Not better ... just different.
I think the main thing to try and get across is the fact that the 'ugly mess' can be re-organised in lots of ways - both re techniques and the final shape of the geom.
pp
The bit I think could cause some problems is the duplicating / overlapping of geometry ... needing the use of cleanup.
Since the mesh looks ok - to the naked eye - it's not apparent whether it's been 'cleaned' or not.
In the noob world, this could cause problems.
I'd probably use a scale | rad >mmb > 0% op to re-locate the inner corner vert, after doing a couple of connect type sequences
Not better ... just different.
I think the main thing to try and get across is the fact that the 'ugly mess' can be re-organised in lots of ways - both re techniques and the final shape of the geom.
pp